In a dramatic turn of events that has sent shockwaves through the intelligence community, FBI agent Jonathan Buma—an outspoken critic of the first Trump administration—has been arrested on charges of unlawfully leaking confidential information.
The charges stem from allegations that Buma, a 15‑year veteran counterintelligence expert, printed and distributed sensitive documents from FBI networks, including files related to investigations of a foreign nation’s weapons of mass destruction program.
This explosive case raises critical questions about internal security, accountability, and the lengths to which individuals within federal agencies might go when their personal agendas clash with official protocols.
In what appears to be a watershed moment for the FBI’s handling of classified information, Buma’s actions have ignited fierce debate over the balance between whistleblower protections and the imperative to safeguard national security.
I. Uncovering the Breach
According to the criminal complaint filed on Tuesday, Jonathan Buma is accused of printing nearly 130 files from secure FBI systems in October 2023.
At least eight of these files contained sensitive reports related to a foreign adversary, with several marked by explicit warnings indicating that the information was to be kept confidential.
The complaint asserts that these documents included protected material supplied by confidential human sources, which were later leaked and appeared in media reports.
Furthermore, Buma is alleged to have printed screenshots of encrypted messages exchanged with a confidential source. These images, which reportedly contained further classified details, somehow found their way into a news story later in the year. The leakage of such information, particularly involving topics as critical as a foreign nation’s weapons of mass destruction program, poses severe risks not only to national security but also to the integrity of FBI operations.
Buma’s actions reportedly coincided with plans to write an autobiographical book, in which he intended to reveal candid details about the bureau’s internal investigations and counterintelligence efforts. According to the complaint, he circulated a draft of his book via email and shared excerpts on social media—moves that blatantly disregarded the strict confidentiality requirements that govern his position.
Attorney Scott Horton commented on the case, emphasizing that “Buma’s conduct raises special concerns about whether counterintelligence activities targeting Russian intelligence have been compromised by internal leaks that the Bureau finds politically embarrassing.” Such statements suggest that Buma’s alleged actions might have disrupted ongoing investigations, particularly those aimed at monitoring foreign interference in U.S. national security.
